Tuesday, October 5, 2010

The Plot Thickens

Evilgiraffe commented on the previous post to this blog, wondering about how to go about plotting a story. I love the name evilgiraffe, because giraffes ARE evil, even though they look at you with those enormous brown eyes and pretend that all they need to be happy are some tasty leaves. They're tall. Tall things make me nervous. Wait — we were talking about plots, and I need to put my mistrust of wildlife on the back burner for a minute, because it's not really relevant here. Or is it?

This has happened to every single one of us, I'm betting: you go to a party/family gathering/work or school function of some kind. You're standing around, minding your own business, when someone rolls up on you and starts recounting an anecdote in great detail. You try to listen to them and follow along, and when they reach the end of their tale, your internal brow gathers in a frown, and you think 'That's it? What was the point of that whole story?' And that's an example of a poorly-plotted story, right there. If the audience doesn't see the point when it's reached its conclusion, you haven't plotted well.

You don't want to be that person who tells an anecdote without a point, which means that you need to plan a coherent story arc. There are many schools of thought on how to go about this, but some basic rules apply, so let's examine those.

A story with engrossing dramatic tension needs several things: at least one character with whom the reader can identify; a catalyst for change that's presented to that character; a hurdle/impediment the character must overcome in order to change; a moment of truth in which the character triumphs over that hurdle/impediment; and the cool-off/denouement, during which the reader gets some measure of resolution.

Now, not every story arc presents itself in such a neat and orderly fashion. Some stories require several moments of truth as a bit of a learning curve for the character, or several minor crises leading up to a larger crisis. Some stories present the reader with a lead character who isn't especially sympathetic (I mean, look at Wuthering Heights, for crying out loud). Some stories offer a catalyst for change that isn't especially attractive (our hero is passed over for a promotion at work, for example, and decides to rob banks for a living because he's tired of being ignored).

So let's begin with one of the simplest and most often-used structures: divide the story into four parts, and call those parts "quarters". The first quarter of the story should be introduction and exposition. The reader meets the main protagonist, who will serve as the emotional tour guide for the story. We learn about who this character is, how and where they live, maybe what they're missing or the lesson they need to learn. Toward the end of the first quarter, we're introduced to the catalyst for change. That introduction sets up the escalating tension and increased tension in the second and third quarters of the story. Usually, there's at least one "crisis" somewhere between the second and third quarters as the story action escalates—think of that crisis as a landing on a flight of stairs. It breaks up the rising action and provides the reader with a moment to look around and figure out where they are in the story progression.

After the mid-point crisis, the action slows down a touch early in the third quarter, then starts to sharply rise again as we enter the fourth quarter and head toward the climax of the story. A brief denouement or resolution follows that climax, and you're done.

If you want to analyze this construction using one of my things, I'm game. In The Port Angeles Players, the story opens with Bella offering us an "easy in" to her life story via an internal monologue about how she comes to be in Forks. We learn that she was inexplicably dumped by Jake, and that Alice convinced her to move to Forks for a fresh start. The introduction of the catalyst for change happens right there in the first chapter when she sees Edward. It's there so early because frankly, I was lazy, and didn't bother revealing Bella's backstory in any kind of natural way—I just kind of threw it at the reader up front. I'd rewrite it, but again, lazy :-) I wanted to play with dialogue and form more than I wanted to be neat about the thing. It's no excuse. I suck, and I'm sorry.

The vehicle that my catalyst Edward drives is the play that he and Bella are involved with. So they get to know each other over the course of the play, and they get to explore the various challenges they each face when it comes to falling in love. The mid-point crisis occurs when Edward's slightly shady past is revealed to Bella. Then we sort of cruise along, and I distract you with relationship things while I introduce a potential crisis with James, which I've sort of vaguely hinted at from the second quarter onward. The James subplot blossoms in the fourth quarter, the action climaxes with the performance of the play, and then I wrap it up in three chapters of denouement and close the story with a zinger to Jake in order to complete the circle.

So, to recap:

First Quarter: Bella's backstory and how she came to be in Forks. She sees Edward. She agrees to audition for the play, where she is again confronted with Edward. Rehearsals begin, and Bella and Edward get to know each other better (chapters 1 - 8)

Second Quarter: Bella and Edward consummate their attraction and begin to develop more profound feelings for each other. Bella is honest with Edward about her history and her fears, but Edward holds back because he doesn't want Bella to think he views her the way he's viewed the women in his life thus far. (chapters 9 - 13)

Chapter 14: mid-point crisis, in which Edward's secrets are revealed

Third Quarter: Bella and Edward discuss and resolve the tension regarding his past, and their relationship progresses and matures. The James subplot begins to sneak into the narrative. (chapters 15 - 20)

Fourth Quarter: Bella meets Edward's parents. The play is staged, and the James subplot unfolds at the climax of the action. Denouement and resolution follow, and Bella has her revenge on Jake. (chapters 21 - 26).

And so that's a basic story arc. I could have wrapped this story up in about twenty chapters, but I bowed to fanfic convention and offered chapters with Edward's POV, which served to slow the pace a little, even though I tried to keep things moving along at a reasonable clip. Because TPAP is a screwball comedy, there's not a ton of heavy conflict involved. However, a reader should be able to follow a clear progression for the characters, and the plot needs to sustain forward motion even in the lightest comedy.

How do you plot your own story using a structure like this? You need to break your story down into bullet-points, as I did above. Note that story quarters often won't divide neatly, but they should come close. So if Bella is your main protagonist, maybe your story looks like this:

First quarter: Chapter 1 - 5 Introduce Bella. Tell us who she is, what she does, where she is, and what she wants. Tell us who she interacts with. Tell us a bit about her history. Create a secondary point of tension (job? school? friend? family?). Toward the end of this quarter, introduce the catalyst/main point of tension or dramatic conflict.

Second quarter: Chapter 6 - 10 Bella reacts to the catalyst. Initial discomfort gives way to curiosity, which prompts investigation and exploration. Secondary point of tension builds, prompting a confrontation of some kind. Continue to develop Bella's surroundings and explore how the catalyst affects these.

Mid-point crisis: Chapter 11 Secondary point of tension reaches climax

Third quarter: Chapter 12 - 16 Secondary point of tension resolved. Catalyst/main point of tension further explored, and tension builds as this quarter reaches the final chapter or two.

Fourth quarter: Chapter 17 - 21 Main point of tension reaches climax and is resolved. Final chapter or two provides clarity and closure, and resolves most important questions.

If you're just starting out, and the story you have in mind is a pretty straightforward one, keep it as simple as possible. It's very, very difficult to sustain compelling dramatic tension for more than ten to fifteen 5k-word chapters with only one point of conflict. So, if Bella is a shy high-school junior, and she longs for Edward, who is a popular senior, don't drag it out. Build up the tension for ten chapters, reach a single dramatic climax (get your minds out of the gutter) around chapter eleven or twelve, and then resolve the story in the final few chapters. The less room you give yourself, the less likelihood you'll cripple the dramatic tension. I'd much rather read a six-chapter story that's tightly-plotted than an eighty-chapter affair that wanders all over the place, even if the writing is so lovely that it makes me sob with pleasure. If you're serious about writing and hoping to have an original work published one day, know that tight plotting is an absolute must.

You don't have to plot out every blessed thing, but every chapter you write should serve a purpose when it comes to advancing the storyline. And by "serve a purpose", I don't mean that having Bella shop for a dress is enough to sustain an entire chapter, even if she'll wear the dress to a party at which she first meets Edward. Something needs to happen in every chapter—something significant, something that changes things for your protagonist. It can be action or a revelation, but something needs to happen in order to climb the stair to the next part of the story.

14 comments:

  1. Thank you for writing these posts. This is so helpful and I've looked for something very practical like this to help me with my writing.

    I've been suffering from writer's block (or plot block), but I think this will help me think things through a little better. I will refer back to this over and over.

    You are a life saver! Love you. Love you writing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In RL, I write news articles for a special interest publication. That is the difficulty: I am accustomed to writing clearly for a non-fic audience. Fiction writing requires me to delve more deeply into character development, settings, emotions. I get lost in those details, bogging the story down. I really worrying about writing "boring", so I end up editing and cutting most of what I've written. The result: my characters have no flesh, the story thin.

    Is is possible to write fic in the who,what,when format that I'm used to? Suggestions, please.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi there, and thanks for reading along! I'll answer your question with a question: is it possible to fall in love or form a friendship based purely on fact? :-) The trick with fiction is risking emotions, and actually feeling along with your characters. If you don't roll the emotional dice, your characters come up snake eyes, every time.

    If you'd like to give it a stab, you can try to outline using the 5Ws by first defining your protagonist and secondary characters REALLY well. I mean it: figure out what music they like, what they eat for breakfast, what makes them sad, what they fear, what they want, etc. That'd be your "who", right there. Move on to the "what", next: what happened to place them where they are at the beginning of the story? What happens to change their circumstances? What actions do they take to either combat or embrace those changes? "When"? When do their feelings change? When do they notice that their feelings have changed? When do they decide to be brave and risk something?

    I'm not sure that's helpful. It's not actually a plotting tool, but it might assist you to start thinking in a more 360-degree way about a story. I think maybe the biggest challenge a non-fiction writer has when making that leap to fiction is removing the emotional distance between yourself and your characters. Non-fiction demands a bit of objectivity; fiction requires the polar opposite :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fabulous post, hugely helpful. It almost made me want to try my hand at a multi-chapter... have stuck with o/s till now, precisely because the idea of trying (and failing!) to sustain dramatic tension stresses me out so much!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you! That's exactly what I was hoping for; I think I can try and plan my current story with a bit more confidence now. I think I am going to be referring back to this post (and the rest of your blog) again and again!

    Giraffes on the whole aren't evil, by the way. Just the odd one or two who eat more leaves than they should... I stole the name from Eddie Izzard, if anyone's wondering - google/youtube it and all will be revealed...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm definitely in that giraffe category, although in my case, it's a subgroup of attack kitties.

    Could we please have a billboard in Times Square about the elegance of a tightly plotted story? Those eighty chapter stories are like me with a bag of candy corn.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi there -
    Long time listener, first time caller. Love your show...er, blog.

    I'm curious about ways other long-time fanfic authors develop their plot lines. Do most authors generate outlines or do the stories develop organically?
    Is there a time when one method works better than the other?
    Finally, is it better to know the ending in advance or to work towards it?

    -denverpopcorn

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey, you!

    Well, I have no idea how anyone else around here does things, but I think it's extremely difficult (if not downright impossible) to produce a decent story arc without knowing in advance where you're going to end up. Again, a story is a journey that the author takes with a set of characters. Not knowing the destination is a bit like piling people into your car and just driving. You'll run out of gas in the middle of nowhere, and then everyone will blame you for not packing snacks and planning ahead.

    The things I do here for fanfic don't have much of an outline, as a general rule. I wing a whole lot, because these stories serve as warm-up exercises I'm doing for a novel I've spent two years outlining in excruciating detail (it's a complicated plot with a truckload of moving parts). But I always, always know where I'm going to end up before I write the first word of a story.

    Is there a time when not planning works? Ummm, maybe, but only if you're trying to loosen your joints with a bit of stream-of-consciousness prose. I know some writers who use "automatic writing" as a way to unblock themselves. Most of the time, it ends up being so much gobbledygook, but if it clears the lane and permits you to write with ease again, more power to ya!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for posting this, Nina. I working on a new story right now and am having the worst time with plotting because my brain is trying to do too much. So thank you for reminding me to keep it simple. <3 <3

    ~caren

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm about to post a comment that truly has no purpose in the grand scheme of life other than to tell you how much I admire you.

    I recently read The Port Angeles Players (in one day, I should add) and was so impressed with the creative maturity in your writing style that I visited your fan fiction profile and then eventually this blog. I've been reading fan fiction for a while now just as a way to blow off steam and relax. I've been thinking about getting into writing some short stories, but have never had a place to start. My education is in Engineering and I'll admit that aside from the English 105 class that was required as a general credit in my undergrad degree, I haven't had the opportunity or desire to write anything more entertaining than a research paper since Mrs. Garrison's honors English class in 12th grade. Here I am, however, standing at the edge of the threshold that leads to your creative writing Utopia with a sense of awe-struck insignificance. Just reading your blog has made me want to be a better writer, even if the only people who read my writing are high-strung engineering perfectionist who can't wait to take me down a notch with their superiority.

    So I promise I won't become your stalker (unless you want me to) but I just wanted you to know that your writing is inspiring others. I know this because these are the most complex sentences I've written since the last time I was being graded on them and it's all because I admire your talent and aspire toward it.
    Thank you for letting me get that out.

    ~Ellz

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Ellz! I'm beyond thrilled if anyone finds anything useful in these posts, and I want to make it clear that I'm just passing along the things that I've learned or experienced in my journey as a writer. I'm not a professor, and I'm sure there are plenty of people out there who have far more to say on the subject of writing fiction, with far more depth and clarity than I could ever hope to offer. In other words, I'm just hanging out and chatting. I don't want to set myself up as someone who thinks she knows it all, because I don't, and could never hope to, really.

    I think that wanting to be a better writer is like wanting to be a better golfer. It's a lifelong process, and you will never get to a point at which you simply can't improve any more. Learning how not to hook or slice your shot when you're assembling a sentence is extremely satisfying, because when you are able to say exactly what you WANT to say, you can put it in front of a reader without regret :-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hey Miss Nina! FYI I'm using this post as a base for NaNoWriMo this year. I'm not a writer by any stretch of the imagination, but I'd like to try the exercise. This is very helpful!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I just wanted to thank you for sharing your advice! I've found this very helpful.

    I'm interested - if you find the time (in a vague future), would it be possible for you to elaborate on the importance of characterisation and character development?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I really enjoy Mac-214's blog. She offers such great writing tips like, "Don't use a comma for a pause, bonehead," and I nod in agreement and try to remember. What I've learned from her has been invaluable. It's helped to remind me of the things I learned in second grade and has informed me of some things I never learned at all. But this, my dear, is hellacool. It's basic, it's educational, it's useful. the only thing lacking is a pdf attached that I can print out and fill in. Thanks for schooling me, thanks for inspiring me to be more organized. And mostly thanks most of all for using the word "denouement" which gave me a wicked flashback from 7th grade wherein I learned about Maslov's Hierarchy of Needs. Because of you, I'm back on track for Self Actualization. I shall never forget you and what you've done for me. :)

    ReplyDelete